Papers
arxiv:2606.01753

Quality-Guided Semi-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Segmentation

Published on Jun 1
· Submitted by
Kumar Abhishek
on Jun 5
Authors:

Abstract

A quality-guided semi-supervised learning framework for medical image segmentation that uses a dedicated quality predictor to improve pseudolabel reliability and segmentation performance.

Training accurate medical image segmentation models requires large amounts of densely annotated data, which is costly and time-consuming to obtain. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) alleviates this by learning from both abundant unlabeled data and limited labeled data. However, most modern SSL methods rely on pseudolabels for unlabeled data, and typically assess their reliability through model confidence or uncertainty, measures that are self-referential and lack explicit grounding in segmentation quality. Instead, we propose a quality-guided SSL framework that trains a dedicated network to estimate segmentation quality from image-mask pairs. The predictor is trained on variable-quality masks generated through synthetic corruptions augmented with imperfect outputs from partially trained segmentation models, capturing realistic error patterns encountered during training. We integrate the quality predictor into SSL through two complementary mechanisms: a quality-aware regularization loss and a quality-based pseudolabel sample reweighting scheme. We show that our method serves as a drop-in enhancement to existing SSL frameworks. Extensive experiments across five datasets and multiple architectures demonstrate consistent improvements over competing SSL methods, advancing the state-of-the-art in semi-supervised medical image segmentation.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

Introduces the first framework-agnostic method to leverage a learned quality prediction model to guide semi-supervised learning (SSL). Two complementary mechanisms for integrating as drop-in enhancements to existing SSL frameworks: differentiable quality regularization and pseudo-label re-weighting. Extensive evaluation across multiple medical imaging datasets, modalities, SSL paradigms, and model architectures.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2606.01753
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.01753 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.01753 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.01753 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.